Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 9 10 20 |
101. Stealth bombers and the need for cloak detection - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Lederstrumpf So you do acknowledge there are ways to make it very hard for cov ops to get into systems? Grats, you're one step off from getting a clue! But please, spare us the "I'm not successfull enough to coordinate a few...
- by Allestin Villimar - at 2010.08.04 04:43:00
|
102. Kill two birds with one stone - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Otocinclus Do you realize how many of these threads there have been? AFK cloakers aren't a problem, they can't do anything to you while they're afk or cloaked. If they're scaring you, then thats your problem, not everyone...
- by Allestin Villimar - at 2010.08.04 04:25:00
|
103. Stealth bombers and the need for cloak detection - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Gabriel Karade The great thing about Eve is it mimics warfare pretty well: sneak up on your opponent and bash his brains in before they know you were there. Allestin, It [0.0] is much more than large fleets blowing each oth...
- by Allestin Villimar - at 2010.08.03 20:01:00
|
104. Stealth bombers and the need for cloak detection - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: darius mclever you dont want to hunt him down. you want to blob him out of your system. If you wanted to hunt him, you would try to bait him. (buffer tanked BS, some neuts, cloaked ships next to the bait) Because I can ...
- by Allestin Villimar - at 2010.08.03 19:56:00
|
105. Stealth bombers and the need for cloak detection - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Sully Tude ARGH! OP STFU, SRSLY! A stealth bomber has a tank of tissue paper! They can, at most, carry about 4 bombs. Maybe 5 if you cargo tank it. If you're out in a ratting Raven or whatever the heck you 0.0 carebears use...
- by Allestin Villimar - at 2010.08.03 18:55:00
|
106. Stealth bombers and the need for cloak detection - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Lederstrumpf Edited by: Lederstrumpf on 03/08/2010 17:12:10 > So I've been hanging out in 0.0 for a couple of months now. 0.0 is comfy as a cushioned wheelchair as long as you win without any effort, isn't it? > ...
- by Allestin Villimar - at 2010.08.03 17:31:00
|
107. Stealth bombers and the need for cloak detection - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: darius mclever Originally by: Allestin Villimar Why should they have 100% safety while afk in enemy territory? replace enemy with hostile. and suddenly you can ask yourself why you can sit 100% safe in your pos/...
- by Allestin Villimar - at 2010.08.03 16:16:00
|
108. Stealth bombers and the need for cloak detection - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: Allestin Villimar on 03/08/2010 14:29:59 Originally by: darius mclever As effortless as your hiding in the station or the pos. If you had the balls to stay for the fight, people wouldnt need to hang out in your space so long...
- by Allestin Villimar - at 2010.08.03 14:29:00
|
109. Stealth bombers and the need for cloak detection - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: Allestin Villimar on 03/08/2010 00:43:06 Originally by: Grarr Dexx Edited by: Grarr Dexx on 03/08/2010 00:01:58 So what if they're completely safe? You can be the same inside a POS, in a station, in a scanned complex, in...
- by Allestin Villimar - at 2010.08.03 00:42:00
|
110. Stealth bombers and the need for cloak detection - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: ShahFluffers Yes, stealth bombers can guarantee victory over a ship weaker than them... so don't fly a ship that is weaker than a stealth bomber. Or use numbers to compensate. A lone stealth bomber will fly defensively by N...
- by Allestin Villimar - at 2010.08.02 21:03:00
|
111. Stealth bombers and the need for cloak detection - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: ShahFluffers For this, I'll reiterate a point I made before... if you don't want to put the effort to defend your space then you'd better learn to fly defensively. And how is someone who is afk in enemy space being "defe...
- by Allestin Villimar - at 2010.08.01 23:31:00
|
112. Stealth bombers and the need for cloak detection - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: ShahFluffers Step up your game then. It's quite easy to catch a cloaking ship if you do it right. Like you said, the amount of ships required to guarantee the capture of a cov ops is fairly ridiculous. I jump through s...
- by Allestin Villimar - at 2010.08.01 00:31:00
|
113. Stealth bombers and the need for cloak detection - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Santiago Fahahrri Originally by: Mahtie he got a point System Denial is a plague in Eve. How come somebody not playing the game can prevent whole group of players to play? This is only possible when the whole gro...
- by Allestin Villimar - at 2010.07.31 11:39:00
|
114. Stealth bombers and the need for cloak detection - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: ShahFluffers You only need a mobile bubble, an interceptor or 2, and a DPS ship (usually ranged) just in case. 20+ for a gate camp is a tad overkill for ONE Recon, let alone ONE Stealth Bomber. That's the kind of gate ca...
- by Allestin Villimar - at 2010.07.31 09:02:00
|
115. Stealth bombers and the need for cloak detection - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Marcus Gideon The problem is not Cloaking... The problem is LOCAL If you didn't know there was an unfriendly face, somewhere "out there", you wouldn't care. If you were worried about invaders, you would control your borde...
- by Allestin Villimar - at 2010.07.30 20:03:00
|
116. Stealth bombers and the need for cloak detection - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: ShahFluffers It doesn't. You just don't want to play defensively like you should already be doing in NULL-SEC. Defensively, just like the guy who afks for hours is playing defensively? CCP forgot to include a counter for...
- by Allestin Villimar - at 2010.07.30 19:40:00
|
117. Stealth bombers and the need for cloak detection - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
I haven't lost any ships to stealth bombers, but I'm getting tired of them hanging around local for hours with no way to catch them. The only thing that's as risk-free as afk cloaking is sitting in a station. I have no problem with people who are ...
- by Allestin Villimar - at 2010.07.30 19:09:00
|
118. Stealth bombers and the need for cloak detection - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
So I've been hanging out in 0.0 for a couple of months now. When there are enemy fleets in the area, we engage them, blow each other up, and it's fun. But problems arise when we get some random ****hat in a stealth bomber. He'll come into the sys...
- by Allestin Villimar - at 2010.07.30 10:12:00
|
119. Did players/forum posters win once again finnally? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Not really on topic anymore but... Originally by: Ghoest Mythics DAOC became maybe the worst example of gamer prejudices influencing game design. It was bad As someone who played DAoC for quite a while, that's not what happened at all...
- by Allestin Villimar - at 2010.07.30 09:36:00
|
120. Station loading screen- any suggestions? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Always happens when the game is laggy, just quit out and try again. I'd only try one character at a time, too. ...in bed.
- by Allestin Villimar - at 2010.07.25 23:31:00
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 9 10 20 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |